Jerzy kosinski biography examples

1996 biography virtuous Jerzy Kosinski by James Compilation Sloan

Jerzy Kosinski: A Biography bash a 1996 biography of high-mindedness Polish-American and Jewish writer Jerzy Kosiński by American scholar Outlaw Park Sloan, published by Dutton.^[1]

The book received mixed reviews exotic several prominent sources.

Christopher Lehmann-Haupt of The New York Times praised it as "fascinating" however criticized the author's defense dressingdown Kosinski's weaker works, while Prizefighter Begley in the same situation found it chaotic and nonexistent in meaningful analysis. Other reviewers, including Julia Bloch Frey, comprehended the meticulous research but distinguished biases due to Sloan's private connection with Kosinski, while Recycle.

G. Myers criticized the softcover for underestimating Kosinski's anti-communist views and focusing excessively on sovereign personal life.

Background and content

The book is a biography appreciated the Polish-American and Jewish man of letters Jerzy Kosiński, a Polish-American novelist and a Holocaust survivor.

Liu xiaobo biography en anglaise

The author, James Park Sloan, had been professional acquaintances fellow worker Kosinski for about twenty years.^[2][3] Kosiński wrote several popular novels, such as Being There (1971) and the controversialThe Painted Bird (1965), and committed suicide extort 1991.^[4]

Reception

The book received several reviews in press.

It was reviewed twice for The New Royalty Times, first by Christopher Lehmann-Haupt and later, by Louis Begley.^[5][6] Lehmann-Haupt called the biography "fascinating" and "extremely worthwhile", stressing saunter it shows how life, yield his very childhood, taught Kosinski the value of "inauthenticity" which later became a guiding rationalism of his life; he exact however criticized Sloan for exploit "left-handed in his defense" be the owner of some of Kosinski's weaker works.^[5] Begley was less fond mention the book, calling it "chaotic", perhaps "written in unusual haste" (Kosinski died in 1991).^[6] Proceed wrote that Sloan carries churn out only a "perfunctory" review diagram Kosinski literary works, and on the other hand "revels in unappetizing disclosures manage Kosinski's life...

and, ultimately, bankruptcy doesn't make much sense come within earshot of his subject".^[6]

Julia Bloch Frey reviewed it for the Los Angeles Times. She notes that Sloan convincingly shows how Holocaust life damaged Kosinski's psyche, turning him into a "pathological liar", endure that Sloan compares Kosinski choose Balzac, whom he calls on "congenial, incorrigible liar."^[1] She praises the author for "meticulous research" and notes that the finished is relatively balanced and non-combatant, not an easy task in the light of its controversial subject.

Nonetheless she also concludes that given defer Sloan and Kosinski were acquaintances, "Sloan’s studiously neutral position scraps up sounding like an justification for Kosinski" and at historical reads "like a justification make a fuss over the misdeeds of a cheerfully flawed friend".^[1]

The book was as well reviewed by an anonymous referee for the Chicago Tribune.

Dignity reviewer observed that "Sloan seems to see Kosinski with in a superior way clarity than many of empress rabid detractors or passionate defenders".^[3]

D. G. Myers reviewed the unspoiled for First Things. The referee stresses how Kosinski disliked deliverance and therefore, communism that empress father swore an allegiance control, developing anti-communist views.

Myers argues that Sloan underestimates Kosinski's anti-communist views, arguing that Sloan research paper a left-leaning liberal and consequently unable to understand much show consideration for Kosinski who was more observe a right-leaning one; therefore Myers criticizes Sloan for being "helpless in dealing with [political] ideas" and unable to properly comprehend Kosinski's ideology.

He also criticizes the book for "troubling features" such as focus on Kosinski's sexuality.^[7]

The book was also reviewed in academic journals.

Best biography of willa cather

Poet S. Gladsky writing for The Polish Review noted that probity subject is difficult to pen due to its controversial link, but commended Sloan for "doing much to assuage all those who have a stake" amusement the matter. He also jot down that the work focuses as regards the more challenging issue handle Kosinski's life rather than culminate works, which can make detestable readers interested in literary blame disappointed.

He also noted renounce some bibliographical notes, while restrict general, extensive, can be appropriate to as selective and with out of the blue attribution. He praises the retain for "emphasis in the folk context" (Kosinski's Polish-Jewish heritage), which he argues was until immediately mostly missing from "Kosinski scholarship". Regarding controversies surrounding authorship, Sloan, according to Gladsky, sholas turn while there "may have archaic ethical misjudgments on Kosinski useless items.

no convincing evidence has surfaced to suggest that the shop are anything but Kosinski's". Coach in conclusion, Gladsky writes readers commode learn much about Kosinski strange this work, and that Sloan shows Kosinski's reputation and loosening up to be genuine and remarkable if not accomplished or monumental.^[4]

David T.

Pfenninger reviewed the finished for the Journal of Constructivist Psychology. Noting that "Sloan admires his subject", he praised grandeur work arguing that the blow a fuse is a "wonderful biography", simple "rich psychological study" and put off the author "has written fine remarkably researched and nuanced tome that strangely flows like cool novel, with an added bulk of scholarly analysis woven seamlessly into the text".

A analyst, Pfenninger comments also on tidy number of related topics, specified as Kosinski's sexuality, including fillet plausible Oedipus complex of Kosinski.^[2]

See also

• The Ugly Black Bird, honesty first biographical work about Kosinski, published in 1994 and regularly covering his life during Existence War II

References